“Now we
command you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away
from any brother who is walking in idleness and not in accord with the
tradition that you received from us. For you yourselves know how you ought to
imitate us, because we were not idle when we were with you, nor did we eat anyone’s bread without paying for
it, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that we might not be a
burden to any of you. It
was not because we do not have that right, but to give you in ourselves an
example to imitate. For
even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not
willing to work, let him not eat. For
we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work, but busybodies. Now such persons we
command and encourage in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their work quietly and to earn
their own living.”
(2 Thessalonians 3:6-12 ESV)
We often debate, when
it comes to political discourse, how to handle public welfare. We often debate
to whom this help should be given, and in what instances. And we often debate
to what extent it should be given.
In the above
passage, however, this issue is discussed not as a matter of politics, but as a
matter of church life. And, in this statement, Paul is very clear. As
Christians, we are expected to work.
When I say this, of
course, I’m not referring exclusively to work outside of the home. I’m
referring to work in all of its forms. I’m referring to work as it is carried
out in our typical vocations.
A stay-at-home
parent, as a case in point, is not considered idle because she fails to work outside
of the home. She would, however, be considered idle if she fails to carry out
the duties of her vocation. She would be considered idle if she fails to care
for her home, her children, and her husband.
Paul also does not
expect those to work who are incapable of doing so. He calls upon the church to
care for older widows. And generosity for those in need is clearly encouraged.
However, as we see
above, Paul calls on Christians to disassociate from those, who profess faith
in Christ, who are idle. He calls on us to keep away from those who are lazy.
He calls on us to withdraw from those who are slothful or sluggish. And he
calls on us to remove ourselves from those who, while they are unwilling to work,
continually involve themselves in the affairs of others.
This type of
lifestyle, he says, is not in accord with the tradition that he and his
followers had passed on to them. He then holds himself up as an example. Even
though he had a right to the support of the congregation, he worked hard while
he was among them that he might not be a burden on them.
He also gave to
them the command that, if anyone was not willing to work, he was not to eat. He
did not permit those who were unwilling to work to receive such help. He did
not allow them to, in this way, prey on the generosity of their brothers and
sisters in Christ.
He commanded and encouraged
such persons to do their work quietly and to earn their own living. He
commanded them to work quietly and to eat their own bread. He encouraged them
to work in a quiet fashion and to earn the food they ate.
As Christians, following
through with this command feels anything but graceful. In fact, it may feel
harsh and critical in nature. It, however, is a form of discipline. It’s a call
to repentance. It’s a way of revealing to the idle the sinfulness of their
inaction that they might receive the mercy of Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment